The relationship between bile reflux and common bile duct diameter after cholecystectomy: a clinical case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to investigate the relationship between bile reflux (BR) and diameter of the common bile duct (CBD) in patients after cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our case series analysis, according to the endoscopy results, the patients who underwent cholecystectomy were divided into two groups as those with BR and those non-BR. Age, sex, CBD diameter measured on ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic biopsy results of the patients were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: In a total of 188 patients included in the study, BR was detected in 93 patients, it was not observed in 95 patients. The CBD diameter of the patients was observed to be 7 mm or less in 70.9% (n = 66) in the BR group, and 23% (n = 22) in the non-BR group. The statistical analysis revealed that while there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of CBD diameter and intestinal metaplasia, the results were similar in both groups in terms of inflammation, activity, atrophy, and Helicobacter pylori. CONCLUSION: We believe that CBD diameter may be a predictive factor in the detection of BR after cholecystectomy.

OBJETIVO: Investigar la relación entre el reflujo biliar y el diámetro del colédoco después de la colecistectomía. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo en el que, de acuerdo con los resultados de la endoscopia, los pacientes que se sometieron a colecistectomía se dividieron en dos grupos: con reflujo biliar y sin reflujo biliar. Se analizaron estadísticamente la edad, el sexo, el diámetro del conducto biliar común medido por ultrasonografía, tomografía computarizada y colangiopancreatografía por resonancia magnética, y los resultados de la biopsia endoscópica. RESULTADOS: En un total de 188 pacientes incluidos en el estudio, se detectó reflujo biliar en 93 pacientes y no se observó en 95 pacientes. Se vio que el diámetro del conducto biliar común de los pacientes era de 7 mm o menos en el 70.9% (n = 66) del grupo con reflujo biliar y en el 23% (n = 22) del grupo sin reflujo biliar. El análisis estadístico reveló que, si bien hubo una diferencia significativa entre los dos grupos en términos de diámetro del conducto biliar común y metaplasia intestinal, los resultados fueron similares en ambos grupos en términos de inflamación, actividad, atrofia y presencia de Helicobacter pylori. CONCLUSIONES: Creemos que el diámetro del colédoco puede ser un factor predictivo en la detección de reflujo biliar después de la colecistectomía.

Is it necessary to use specimen retrieval bag for reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic appendectomy?A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the comparison the effects of the extraction of specimen by using a specimen retrieval bag (SRB) or direct extraction through trochar in terms of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: A total of 165 patients were randomly allocated into two groups. A SRB was used in 77 patients (Group 1, 46.7%) and not used in 88 patients (Group 2, 53.3%). Demographics, comorbid diseases, laboratory results, preoperative diameter of appendix, intraoperative observations, intraoperative procedures, hospitalization times, SSIs, pathology results, culture results, and findings of the patients who developed complications and the treatments given to the patients due to complications during the post-operative period were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 33.95 SD 13.25 (min-max: 18-78) years. No significant difference was observed in the demographics, hospitalization times, distribution of the incidence rates of diabetes mellitus, perioperative perforation, perioperative fluid/abscess, drain insertion, aspiration-irrigation, superficial incisional SSI, drainage requirement, leakage, positive culture results, and post-operative intra-abdominal infection (p>0.05) between the groups. Neutrophil and leukocyte values were statistically significantly different between the groups (p=0.044 and p=0.012, respectively). There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the complicated appendicitis (p=0.040). There was no significant difference in terms of the positive culture results and incidence of post-operative intra-abdominal infection between the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 in both the complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis groups (p>0.05). The difference between the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 regarding the incidence of superficial incisional SSI was significant in the uncomplicated appendicitis group (p=0.037), whereas not significant in the complicated appendicitis group (p=1.000). In the multivariate model, only perioperative perforation was observed to be the effective parameter on post-operative intra-abdominal infection at the p<0.05 level (p=0.045). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study revealed that the use of SRB does not prevent microbial seeding in patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy; therefore, it was concluded that using SRB is not associated with SSI at laparoscopic appendectomy.

Is Polycystic Ovary Syndrome a Predisposing Factor for Pilonidal Sinus Disease?

BACKGROUND: The incidence of pilonidal sinus may be increased in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and risk factors of pilonidal sinus disease in women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome in the same population. DESIGN: This was a case-control study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in a Turkish rural district state hospital. PATIENTS: This study included 40 female patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and 120 female patients without polycystic ovary syndrome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of pilonidal sinus, age, BMI, number of baths per week, daily sitting time, and family history of pilonidal sinus were recorded. RESULTS: Pilonidal sinus was detected in 22.5% (12.5% asymptomatic pits, 10% symptomatic) of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and 1.7% of the control group ( p < 0.001). No difference was noted between the 2 groups in terms of BMI ( p = 0.219). Family history was similar between the case and control groups ( p = 0.520). No significant difference was noted between the 2 groups in terms of insufficient hygiene and daily sitting time ( p = 0.763, p = 0.706). Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of pilonidal sinus was significantly higher in patients with a positive family history ( p = 0.008). LIMITATIONS: The number of patients in the case and control groups in the study was limited. In addition, the control group may not fully reflect the general population because it was composed of only patients who presented to the general surgery and gynecology outpatient clinic for other reasons. The control group was not age matched. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we found that the prevalence of pilonidal sinus was significantly higher in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B945 . ES EL SNDROME DE OVARIO POLIQUSTICO UN FACTOR PREDISPONENTE PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DEL SENO PILONIDAL: ANTECEDENTES:La incidencia de enfermedad del seno pilonidal puede aumentar en mujeres con síndrome de ovario poliquístico.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue comparar la prevalencia y los factores de riesgo de la enfermedad del seno pilonidal en una misma poblacion de mujeres con y sin síndrome de ovario poliquístico.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de casos y controles.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Se llevó a cabo en un hospital estatal de un distrito rural turco.PACIENTES:Este estudio incluyó a 40 pacientes mujeres con síndrome de ovario poliquístico y 120 pacientes mujeres sin síndrome de ovario poliquístico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Se registraron la prevalencia del seno pilonidal, la edad, el IMC, el número de duchas por semana, el tiempo diario para sentarse y los antecedentes familiares de seno pilonidal.RESULTADOS:El seno pilonidal se detectó en el 22,5 % (12,5 % fosas asintomáticas, 10 % sintomáticas) de las pacientes con síndrome de ovario poliquístico y en el 1,7 % del grupo control ( p < 0,001). No se observaron diferencias entre los dos grupos en términos de IMC ( p = 0,219). Los antecedentes familiares fueron similares entre los grupos de casos y controles ( p = 0,520). No se observaron diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos en términos de higiene insuficiente y tiempo de sedentarismo diario ( p = 0,763, p = 0,706). El análisis multivariante mostró que el riesgo de seno pilonidal fue significativamente mayor en pacientes con antecedentes familiares positivos ( p = 0,008).LIMITACIONES:El número de pacientes en los grupos de casos y controles en el estudio fue limitado. Además, es posible que el grupo de control no refleje completamente a la población general, ya que está compuesto solo por pacientes que acudieron a la consulta externa de cirugía general y ginecología por otras razones. El grupo de control no fue emparejado por edad.CONCLUSIONES:En nuestro estudio encontramos que la prevalencia de seno pilonidal fue significativamente mayor en pacientes con síndrome de ovario poliquístico. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B945 . (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Performance of Residents During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Self-assessment Reliable?

BACKGROUND: To compare the self-assessment of surgical residents and observers (faculty members and nurses) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted between February 2020 and July 2020 at a medical school hospital. Seventy-four LC surgeries were performed by surgical residents in the presence of faculty members. A self-assessment of the technical and nontechnical performance of the residents was requested. The self-assessment of residents was compared with observer evaluations using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Gwet AC2 fit coefficient was used to determine the consistency between the observers' and residents' assessments. Bland-Altman plots were generated with 95% limits of agreement to describe the agreement between the total scores of the observers. RESULTS: The self-assessment of residents had a statistically significant higher score when compared with observers (faculty and nurses) (P<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between the total scores given by the observers (faculty members and nurses) (P>0.05). There was a moderate agreement between the resident versus faculty members [0.503; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.430-0.576] and resident versus nurse (0.518; 95% CI, 0.432-0.605) when evaluating technical skills. However, there was substantial agreement between faculty members and nurses (0.736; 95% CI, 0.684-0.789). Postoperative pain was significantly correlated with resident self-assessment (P=0.022). CONCLUSION: The self-assessment scores of surgical residents in LC operations were overestimated compared with observer assessments.